Danvers‘s Hometown News Site

What does power look like when the world has already decided you don’t have any? PONIES begins with that question embedded deep in its DNA, not as a slogan or thesis, but as its core message. Set in 1977 Moscow, the series doesn’t treat espionage as a fantasy of dominance or bravado. Instead, it frames spycraft as an act of endurance, adaptation, and emotional intelligence, told through two women who were never meant to matter to that world and therefore become dangerous precisely because of it.

What does it mean to document a place without turning it into a character? That question sits quietly at the center of GLENDORA, not as a thesis statement but as a guiding principle. Isabelle Armand’s first feature documentary isn’t quite an exposé or even corrective; instead, it positions itself as a long conversation, one built over half a decade of presence, listening, and shared time. The result is a film that feels less like an argument and more like an invitation to witness a community on its own terms. I wasn’t sure what to expect before starting the film, and even after watching it, I was still left with a lingering sense of so many unknowns.

What happens when a cabin-in-the-woods movie stops worrying about who the villain is and starts asking how quickly people turn on each other once fear sets in? CABIN FEVER opens with that underlying question simmering beneath its surface, immediately showing that Eli Roth wasn’t interested in delivering a standard genre film. Instead, his feature debut barrels forward with the confidence of someone who knows exactly how divisive the result will be and welcomes it. The film doesn’t ease you into its world; it drops you into a chaotic, intentionally uncomfortable situation, daring you to keep up.

What do we judge when the film in front of us was never allowed to finish becoming itself? QUEEN KELLY exists in that uncomfortable space between artifact and artwork, a film that cannot be separated from its collapse yet refuses to be dismissed because of it. Any serious engagement with this work has to accept that incompleteness isn’t a defect bolted onto the experience—it’s the experience. What survives is not a tidy narrative, but a raw exposure of ambition colliding with power, ego, censorship, and the end of an entire cinematic era.

What happens to trust when the future stops being abstract and starts knocking at your door? THE STRANGE DARK frames its central question with quiet confidence, stripping science fiction down to its most intimate stakes and asking how certainty corrodes relationships long before it saves them. This is a chamber thriller built less on spectacle than on erosion—of faith, of communication, of the fragile agreements that keep families functioning when reality no longer behaves as expected.

What happens when the thing that once defined you refuses to let you mature alongside the world? MYSTERY TEAM builds its entire identity around that question, then dares to stretch what should be a ten-minute sketch into a feature-length experiment that somehow survives on commitment alone. On paper, the concept sounds thin: former child detectives, now legally adults, still solving playground crimes while the rest of the world has moved on. In execution, though, the film leans so aggressively into that arrested state that it becomes less a parody of detective stories and more a portrait of people who never learned how to recalibrate their identity once the applause stopped.

What happens when a horror-comedy doesn’t care enough about scares or laughs? FULL MOON HIGH is one of those films that practically dares you to misunderstand it. On the surface, it looks like a goofy werewolf parody that came on the scene at the exact wrong moment, released in the same year as some genuinely transformative genre landmarks. That surface exploration is easy, and for many viewers, it’s where the conversation ends. But writer/director Larry Cohen was never interested in making things easy, and even his silliest film carries teeth beneath the fur.

What happens when a crime film is more in love with the idea of danger than the consequences that are supposed to come with it? A GANGSTER’S LIFE wants to kick the door open with confidence. From the first moments, it makes its intentions obvious, leaning hard into the image of the modern British gangster film, the kind that thrives on penetrating dialogue, fast cuts, and characters who believe they are far cleverer than they actually are. The problem is that confidence alone doesn’t equate to authority, and this film often mistakes surface-level ‘cool’ for actual control over tone, story, and consequences.

What happens when grief doesn’t want to be processed, but instead wants to be felt again and again, no matter the cost? COME CLOSER begins inside that unresolved ache and never pretends there’s a way out of it. Written and directed by Tom Nesher, the film is intensely personal, shaped by loss, and that authenticity bleeds into every creative choice. The story follows Eden, a young woman whose identity has been tethered to her brother, Nati. When he dies suddenly, the rupture isn’t just emotional; it’s existential. Eden doesn’t know who she is without him, and rather than learning how to exist alone, she searches for a way to keep him present by proxy. That search leads her to Maya, the secret girlfriend she never knew existed, and the film’s central relationship is born from that collision of mourning and curiosity.

What would you agree to if the money sounded easy enough and the people offering it kept smiling like it was all just a joke? CHEAP THRILLS opens with that deceptively simple question and then spends the rest of its runtime stripping away every excuse you might use to answer it without flinching.

What does it take for an “honorable” man to admit he’s in a rigged game? BLOOD OF REVENGE drops you into Osaka with a premise that sounds familiar on paper—rival gangs, business dealings, and public respectability used as camouflage. Director Tai Kato treats that setup less like a springboard for nonstop action and more like a vise. The story’s fuel isn’t gunfire or body counts, it’s procedure: who controls labor, who controls construction, who gets to claim authenticity, and who’s forced to swallow insults because retaliation would ignite the entire city. That focus makes the movie feel more advanced than a lot of genre counterparts that sprint straight to the payoff, and it gives the drama room to breathe even when you can already sense where it’s headed.

What does survival look like when love exists, but stability doesn’t? That question sits at the center of what makes SHAMELESS so iconic from its opening scenes and never really lets go. Across eleven seasons, the series refuses to romanticize poverty, dysfunction, or family loyalty; instead, it treats endurance as a daily obligation rather than an achievement. Rewatching the complete run now, with the benefit of distance, makes it clear how deliberate that choice was, and how much of the show’s power comes from its unwillingness to soften the damage its characters inflict on one another.

What happens when a comfort mystery realizes it has nothing left to prove and decides to complicate its own formula instead? HARRY WILD Series 3 opens with that confidence, leaning into the core the show has already established while gently nudging its world toward greater emotional depth. This is no longer a series finding its footing; it understands exactly what it is and tests how far that identity can stretch without breaking the spell that made audiences fall for it in the first place.

What does it actually mean to finish something that once lived only in your head? That question underpins DELIVERING THE FETUS, even when the book is focused on logistics, budgets, casting decisions, or the reality of watching plans collapse in real time. On the surface, Joe Lam’s book presents itself as a behind-the-scenes account of making a low-budget horror film. In practice, it becomes something far more reflective. This is not just a guide to indie filmmaking; it’s an examination of compromise, endurance, and the emotional weight of turning intention into something tangible.

What happens when success, independence, and status fail to protect you from the structures designed to break you? SPLENDID OUTING opens with that unsettling thought embedded in its premise, and it never lets go. Kim Soo-yong’s 1978 film plays out like a waking nightmare, one that begins in the world of professional achievement and ends in a suffocating landscape of control, denial, and enforced identity. What makes the film so enduring and so disturbing is how it presents its cruelty, as if to insist that this is not an anomaly but an extension of the society that produced it.