Danvers‘s Hometown News Site

Alan Friel’s WOKEN understands how unsettling uncertainty can become when nobody around you seems willing just to say what’s going on. Rather than approaching mystery through explosive reveals or fast-moving twists, the film builds tension through isolation, fragmented memory, and the growing suspicion that every answer being offered comes with something being withheld. That atmosphere becomes the movie’s greatest strength, especially in its first half, where nearly every interaction feels off in ways difficult to define.

PITFALL wastes very little time making its intentions clear. Within the opening stretch, James Kondelik’s survival slasher establishes the woods as a place where nature itself already feels hostile long before the actual killer enters the picture. Animals die suddenly. The environment feels damp, unstable, and isolating. Characters move through the forest like they’re stepping deeper into something that stopped being safe years ago. By the time the film drops its character into the trap, the movie has already built an atmosphere that feels grimy, anxious, and mean in all the right ways. What’s interesting is that PITFALL doesn’t operate like a traditional slasher despite carrying a lot of that DNA.

There’s an unmistakable energy running through MY BEST FRIEND’S DEAD that feels less concerned with perfection than emotional payoff. The film is messy at times, uneven in places, occasionally rough around the edges, but it also feels alive in a way a lot of low-budget horror doesn’t anymore. Bruce Wemple’s film understands that atmosphere and sincerity can carry imperfections much further than empty technical precision ever could.

CONTENT opens with a therapist coercing one of her patients into mutilating himself over Zoom. It’s ugly, uncomfortable, and played with enough realism that the sequence lands with genuine tension. Then everything ‘collapses’. I had actually typed out far more here, but in retrospect, I think I explained too much and deleted this part. The unknown is what makes this film work so well!

The strongest thing 13 SOULS has going for it isn’t the possession angle, the setting, or even the supernatural mythology woven throughout the story. It’s the atmosphere of emotional decay hanging over nearly every frame. Writer/director Paulo Nascimento approaches the material less like a traditional jump-scare genre film and more like a story about damage spreading through a family already fractured long before the paranormal elements reveal themselves. That emotional aspect gives the film a more robust foundation than many low-budget possession horror films do.

There’s a moment early on in ROBIN HOOD: PRINCE OF THIEVES where Kevin Costner returns to England, discovers his family home destroyed, and reacts with the emotional sincerity that only existed in gigantic studio adventure films from this era. The movie isn’t interested in subtlety. It’s not trying to be historically accurate. It wants anguish, vengeance, romance, giant musical swells, flaming arrows, dramatic speeches, and villains loud enough to shake castle walls. Somehow, against all odds, it mostly works.

Darkness usually defines the depths of noir. INSOMNIA does the exact opposite. Erik Skjoldbjærg’s 1997 psychological thriller traps its characters beneath endless daylight, turning constant visibility into an oppressive, deeply unsettling force. The result still feels strange nearly thirty years later. Instead of hiding corruption in shadows, the film forces every mistake, lie, and moment of panic into the open. Nothing gets concealed, yet nobody sees things clearly either.

Raccoons, and foxes, and bears… oh my… There’s a version of MATING SEASON that could’ve been completely unbearable. The premise alone practically invites disaster, taking the idea of shows like BIG MOUTH and its spinoff HUMAN RESOURCES, an adult animated comedy about sexually frustrated forest animals trying to find love, connection, and someone to reproduce with. It sounds like the kind of concept designed entirely around shock value and memes, something built to survive for a week online before disappearing into the endless content void. Instead, the series turns out to be much deeper, stranger, and more self-aware than its setup suggests.

KYLE LARSON VS. THE DOUBLE spends a lot of time explaining how difficult “The Double” is, but not nearly enough time exploring why the attempt actually matters beyond the spectacle itself. The documentary aims to leave viewers impressed by Kyle Larson’s endurance, discipline, and willingness to push himself to the limits of motorsports’ most demanding challenge. On a surface level, that part works. Racing both the Indianapolis 500 and the Coca-Cola 600 on the same day is objectively absurd. The logistics alone sound exhausting before a single lap is even completed. But the deeper the film goes into the mechanics of the challenge, the more noticeable its emotional and analytical blind spots become. That’s ultimately what holds the documentary back.

There’s an uncomfortable honesty running through ORANGE-FLAVOURED WEDDING that keeps it from turning into the kind of family reunion drama its premise initially suggests. Christophe Honoré frames the wedding itself almost like an emotional pressure cooker, not as a moment when everyone reconnects, but as an event that forces people to occupy the same physical space. At the same time, years of unresolved resentment sit between them. The result is a film that feels personal, occasionally chaotic, and far more interested in emotional scars than sentimentality.

There’s an honesty running through FOR THE OPPONENTS that makes the film feel larger than its fifteen-minute runtime. Director Federico Luis doesn’t approach Tepito as an outsider seeking hardship. The neighborhood isn’t presented as an exhibit, nor does the film reduce its people to symbols of struggle for effect. Instead, it feels like you’re there from the very first moments, carrying the kind of natural familiarity that only works when a filmmaker understands the difference between observing people and truly seeing them.

MAXIMUM PLEASURE GUARANTEED feels like the kind of show where one terrible decision should logically end everything, but instead it opens another door. Then another. Then suddenly, somebody’s lying in a parking lot, somebody else is hiding information they absolutely should’ve shared hours ago, and Tatiana Maslany is trying to hold herself together during youth soccer practice, like her entire life isn’t actively collapsing.

There’s a precise kind of exhaustion that only comes from family. Not hatred, not resentment, not even conflict in the conventional sense. Just the emotional fatigue of people who’ve known each other too long, understand each other too well, and still fail to communicate in ways that matter. 9 TEMPLES TO HEAVEN understands that feeling. Instead of trying to dramatize it into explosive confrontations or sentimental breakthroughs, the film lets it settle naturally. Conversations trail off. Small disagreements continue. Silence becomes its own language. By the time this family reaches the later stages of their pilgrimage, the emotional weariness hanging over them feels almost physical.

THE ANGRY RIVER spends a surprising amount of time feeling like a movie caught between generations. You can see the older wuxia style still clinging to it, from the heightened melodrama to the elaborate fantasy elements, but underneath all of that is the early pulsation of something faster, rougher, and more aggressive beginning to emerge. That tension becomes more interesting than the actual plot at times because the film accidentally documents a studio and an entire genre reinventing itself in real time.

SICK PUPPY understands something a lot of dark comedies miss entirely. Absurdity only works when the people trapped inside it stop recognizing it as absurd. Jay Reid’s film doesn’t treat murder like a punchline dropped into an otherwise normal marriage. It treats it like rot that’s settled so deeply into the foundation of a relationship that it’s begun reshaping the logic of everyone living inside it. Charlie doesn’t see herself as the wife of a monster. She sees herself as someone trying to save a man she loves from the worst parts of himself, the same way another couple might struggle through addiction, anger issues, or self-destruction. That’s what gives the film its edge. Beneath it all sits a disturbingly sincere portrait of emotional denial, where love has become so tangled with rationalization that even serial murder starts feeling like just another obstacle to avoid.