Danvers‘s Hometown News Site

What happens when the institutions meant to protect truth decide that truth itself has become inconvenient? (sound familiar?) ILLUSTROUS CORPSES opens with that question hanging heavy in the air, and it never lets the audience forget it. From its earliest moments, Francesco Rosi’s film makes clear that this isn’t a mystery interested in easy answers or comforting resolutions. It’s a procedural that treats procedure as theater, and a thriller that understands the most frightening forces are rarely the ones you expect or the most visible villains.

What line do you cross when survival stops feeling optional? KAISHAKU plants that question at its core and refuses to let it go, using supernatural horror not as an escape from reality, but as a pressure chamber that magnifies every ethical crack already present in its characters. The film makes clear it’s not interested in shock-driven horror or easy moral binaries. Instead, it studies the quiet devastation of compromise and asks what kind of damage lingers when a choice is technically consensual but spiritually corrosive.

What happens when escape isn’t redemption? SINNERS opens with that idea baked into its bones, framing its story around the false promise of starting over. From the outset, writer/director Ryan Coogler positions the film as something deliberately unstable; a work that shifts shapes, tones, and genres not to show off, but to reflect the fractured inner lives of its characters. This is not a horror film that just wants to scare you. It wants to sit you down inside a history that never stopped haunting itself. And congratulations to the record-breaking Oscar-nominated film, having surpassed films like ALL ABOUT EVE, TITANIC, and LA LA LAND that all held 14 nominations, SINNERS received 16, and rightfully so!

What happens when a horror film refuses to dampen its premise with humor, even when the premise itself borders on the absurd? LUTHER THE GEEK answers that question by committing, sometimes uncomfortably, to a nightmare that never pauses to reassure the audience it’s in on the joke. This is not a standard slasher, nor a self-aware cult oddity; it’s a blunt, regional exploitation film that believes in its monster completely, for better and for worse.

What happens when a performer best known for chaos steps into a legend that predates him by decades? KING OF BEGGARS exists with that unparalleled tension, caught between reverence for a folk hero and the pull of Stephen Chow’s emerging screen persona. The result is a film that’s consistently entertaining, intermittently moving, and structurally uneven, yet impossible to dismiss given its place in Hong Kong cinema history.

What happens when admiration solidifies into entitlement, and the object of worship is already dead? FRIGHTMARE asks that question with a smirk, then answers it with blood, thunder, and a coffin that refuses to stay closed. Norman Thaddeus Vane’s oddball supernatural slasher sits at an uneasy crossroads between tribute and takedown, fascinated by classic horror iconography while clearly skeptical of the people who fetishize it. That tension defines nearly every choice the film makes, for better and worse.

What happens when conviction hardens into performance and belief becomes a tool rather than a refuge? THE GODLESS GIRL doesn’t ease into that question; it charges at it headfirst, convinced that moral certainty justifies any amount of excess. As Cecil B. DeMille’s final silent feature, the film plays like both a culmination and a confession, a work where technical mastery and ideological rigidity collide without apology.

What happens when the battles that defined you refuse to stay in the past? ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER opens with that unease baked directly into its DNA, less interested in the romance of rebellion than in the emotional rubble left behind when ideology outlives usefulness. Paul Thomas Anderson doesn’t frame this story as a heroic return to purpose; he frames it as a reckoning, one that arrives whether the characters are ready for it or not.

What does kindness look like when it’s treated not as sentiment, but as a disruptive force? BABE asks that question with a disarming calm, presenting gentleness not as weakness but as something radical. BABE: PIG IN THE CITY takes the same character and throws him into a world that doesn’t reward decency so easily. The resulting contrast makes this double feature far more interesting than its wholesome reputation might suggest.

What happens when a mystery stacks its cast with Hollywood legends but forgets to center the detective meant to solve the crime? THE MIRROR CRACK’D opens with all the trappings of a classic Agatha Christie adaptation: a quaint village, a glamorous film production, and a murder that should disrupt both worlds. Instead, the film takes its time deciding what it wants to be, splitting its focus between star-driven character drama and procedural intrigue, and never fully committing to either. That tension shapes the entire experience, for better and for worse.

What happens when a murder mystery stops pretending suspense comes from darkness and instead lets everything unfold in the daylight? EVIL UNDER THE SUN doesn’t just answer that question; it builds its entire personality around it. Set against blinding Mediterranean sunshine and unapologetic luxury, the film understands that the true tension of a whodunit doesn’t come from shadows, but from proximity. Everyone is too close, too comfortable, too beautifully dressed to be innocent.

What does fear look like when it’s passed down as a myth from one person to another, rather than fact? THE MYSTERIOUS GAZE OF THE FLAMINGO approaches that question with patience, filtering terror through the eyes of a child and allowing imagination, rumors, and love to coexist without flattening any of them into simple allegory.

What happens when a heist story refuses to let its characters hide behind competence? STEAL opens with a familiar setup, then steadily strips away the fantasy of control, replacing it with panic, compromise, and moral erosion in a space designed for spreadsheets, not shootouts. Every time you think you know where this thriller is headed, it slams you into a wall and turns the corner in the best way possible.

What happens when a story mistakes cruelty for insight and noise for tension? THE VINDICATOR sets out to interrogate the ethics of true crime obsession, but quickly reveals that it’s far more interested in staging punishment than in examining the culture it borrows from. The result is a film with a provocative hook and very little clarity about what it wants to say once that hook is in place.