Minier‘s Hometown News Site

What does intimacy look like when romance and sex stop meaning the same thing? PAYING FOR IT doesn’t pose that question as a provocation; it treats it as an inevitability. Set in the late 1990s, the film approaches non-monogamy, sex work, and emotional distance with a level of candor that feels rare, especially in a culture still trained to frame love as something that must follow a prescribed path to be considered valid.

What happens when a horror film wants to question religious trauma but refuses to weaponize fear in service of that goal? INHABITANTS opens with a promising premise, pairing domestic unease with spiritual guilt, and initially suggests a slow-burning examination of belief systems colliding under supernatural pressure. On paper, that approach makes sense; religious horror has always thrived on conflict. In practice, though, the film rarely pushes beyond suggestion, settling into a muted exploration that drains tension rather than cultivating it.

What happens when the institutions meant to protect truth decide that truth itself has become inconvenient? (sound familiar?) ILLUSTROUS CORPSES opens with that question hanging heavy in the air, and it never lets the audience forget it. From its earliest moments, Francesco Rosi’s film makes clear that this isn’t a mystery interested in easy answers or comforting resolutions. It’s a procedural that treats procedure as theater, and a thriller that understands the most frightening forces are rarely the ones you expect or the most visible villains.

What line do you cross when survival stops feeling optional? KAISHAKU plants that question at its core and refuses to let it go, using supernatural horror not as an escape from reality, but as a pressure chamber that magnifies every ethical crack already present in its characters. The film makes clear it’s not interested in shock-driven horror or easy moral binaries. Instead, it studies the quiet devastation of compromise and asks what kind of damage lingers when a choice is technically consensual but spiritually corrosive.

What happens when escape isn’t redemption? SINNERS opens with that idea baked into its bones, framing its story around the false promise of starting over. From the outset, writer/director Ryan Coogler positions the film as something deliberately unstable; a work that shifts shapes, tones, and genres not to show off, but to reflect the fractured inner lives of its characters. This is not a horror film that just wants to scare you. It wants to sit you down inside a history that never stopped haunting itself. And congratulations to the record-breaking Oscar-nominated film, having surpassed films like ALL ABOUT EVE, TITANIC, and LA LA LAND that all held 14 nominations, SINNERS received 16, and rightfully so!

What happens when a horror film refuses to dampen its premise with humor, even when the premise itself borders on the absurd? LUTHER THE GEEK answers that question by committing, sometimes uncomfortably, to a nightmare that never pauses to reassure the audience it’s in on the joke. This is not a standard slasher, nor a self-aware cult oddity; it’s a blunt, regional exploitation film that believes in its monster completely, for better and for worse.

What happens when a performer best known for chaos steps into a legend that predates him by decades? KING OF BEGGARS exists with that unparalleled tension, caught between reverence for a folk hero and the pull of Stephen Chow’s emerging screen persona. The result is a film that’s consistently entertaining, intermittently moving, and structurally uneven, yet impossible to dismiss given its place in Hong Kong cinema history.

What happens when admiration solidifies into entitlement, and the object of worship is already dead? FRIGHTMARE asks that question with a smirk, then answers it with blood, thunder, and a coffin that refuses to stay closed. Norman Thaddeus Vane’s oddball supernatural slasher sits at an uneasy crossroads between tribute and takedown, fascinated by classic horror iconography while clearly skeptical of the people who fetishize it. That tension defines nearly every choice the film makes, for better and worse.

What happens when conviction hardens into performance and belief becomes a tool rather than a refuge? THE GODLESS GIRL doesn’t ease into that question; it charges at it headfirst, convinced that moral certainty justifies any amount of excess. As Cecil B. DeMille’s final silent feature, the film plays like both a culmination and a confession, a work where technical mastery and ideological rigidity collide without apology.

What happens when the battles that defined you refuse to stay in the past? ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER opens with that unease baked directly into its DNA, less interested in the romance of rebellion than in the emotional rubble left behind when ideology outlives usefulness. Paul Thomas Anderson doesn’t frame this story as a heroic return to purpose; he frames it as a reckoning, one that arrives whether the characters are ready for it or not.

What does kindness look like when it’s treated not as sentiment, but as a disruptive force? BABE asks that question with a disarming calm, presenting gentleness not as weakness but as something radical. BABE: PIG IN THE CITY takes the same character and throws him into a world that doesn’t reward decency so easily. The resulting contrast makes this double feature far more interesting than its wholesome reputation might suggest.

What happens when a mystery stacks its cast with Hollywood legends but forgets to center the detective meant to solve the crime? THE MIRROR CRACK’D opens with all the trappings of a classic Agatha Christie adaptation: a quaint village, a glamorous film production, and a murder that should disrupt both worlds. Instead, the film takes its time deciding what it wants to be, splitting its focus between star-driven character drama and procedural intrigue, and never fully committing to either. That tension shapes the entire experience, for better and for worse.

What happens when a murder mystery stops pretending suspense comes from darkness and instead lets everything unfold in the daylight? EVIL UNDER THE SUN doesn’t just answer that question; it builds its entire personality around it. Set against blinding Mediterranean sunshine and unapologetic luxury, the film understands that the true tension of a whodunit doesn’t come from shadows, but from proximity. Everyone is too close, too comfortable, too beautifully dressed to be innocent.

What does fear look like when it’s passed down as a myth from one person to another, rather than fact? THE MYSTERIOUS GAZE OF THE FLAMINGO approaches that question with patience, filtering terror through the eyes of a child and allowing imagination, rumors, and love to coexist without flattening any of them into simple allegory.

What happens when a story mistakes cruelty for insight and noise for tension? THE VINDICATOR sets out to interrogate the ethics of true crime obsession, but quickly reveals that it’s far more interested in staging punishment than in examining the culture it borrows from. The result is a film with a provocative hook and very little clarity about what it wants to say once that hook is in place.

How much control are you willing to surrender if someone promises it will keep you safe? DOOBA DOOBA opens with that unsettling question and then builds an entire film around the discomfort of never knowing who is in charge of the situation you’re watching. Framed entirely through in-home security cameras and rooted in the analog/found footage horror tradition, the film doesn’t try to make you feel welcome. It wants you disoriented, unsure, and constantly second-guessing what you’re seeing and why you’re being allowed to see it at all.

What happens when a crime film is more in love with the idea of danger than the consequences that are supposed to come with it? A GANGSTER’S LIFE wants to kick the door open with confidence. From the first moments, it makes its intentions obvious, leaning hard into the image of the modern British gangster film, the kind that thrives on penetrating dialogue, fast cuts, and characters who believe they are far cleverer than they actually are. The problem is that confidence alone doesn’t equate to authority, and this film often mistakes surface-level ‘cool’ for actual control over tone, story, and consequences.

What do we owe our children when the damage we carry predates them? That issue endures throughout THE CONFESSION, a supernatural horror film that reaches for generational reckoning even as it struggles to keep its own mythology in check. Writer/director Will Canon builds the story around grief, inheritance, and moral debt, crafting a film that wants to unsettle both emotionally and spiritually, even if it never reconciles its ambition with execution.

What does it mean to document a place without turning it into a character? That question sits quietly at the center of GLENDORA, not as a thesis statement but as a guiding principle. Isabelle Armand’s first feature documentary isn’t quite an exposé or even corrective; instead, it positions itself as a long conversation, one built over half a decade of presence, listening, and shared time. The result is a film that feels less like an argument and more like an invitation to witness a community on its own terms. I wasn’t sure what to expect before starting the film, and even after watching it, I was still left with a lingering sense of so many unknowns.

What happens when a cabin-in-the-woods movie stops worrying about who the villain is and starts asking how quickly people turn on each other once fear sets in? CABIN FEVER opens with that underlying question simmering beneath its surface, immediately showing that Eli Roth wasn’t interested in delivering a standard genre film. Instead, his feature debut barrels forward with the confidence of someone who knows exactly how divisive the result will be and welcomes it. The film doesn’t ease you into its world; it drops you into a chaotic, intentionally uncomfortable situation, daring you to keep up.

What do we judge when the film in front of us was never allowed to finish becoming itself? QUEEN KELLY exists in that uncomfortable space between artifact and artwork, a film that cannot be separated from its collapse yet refuses to be dismissed because of it. Any serious engagement with this work has to accept that incompleteness isn’t a defect bolted onto the experience—it’s the experience. What survives is not a tidy narrative, but a raw exposure of ambition colliding with power, ego, censorship, and the end of an entire cinematic era.

What happens to trust when the future stops being abstract and starts knocking at your door? THE STRANGE DARK frames its central question with quiet confidence, stripping science fiction down to its most intimate stakes and asking how certainty corrodes relationships long before it saves them. This is a chamber thriller built less on spectacle than on erosion—of faith, of communication, of the fragile agreements that keep families functioning when reality no longer behaves as expected.

What happens when the thing that once defined you refuses to let you mature alongside the world? MYSTERY TEAM builds its entire identity around that question, then dares to stretch what should be a ten-minute sketch into a feature-length experiment that somehow survives on commitment alone. On paper, the concept sounds thin: former child detectives, now legally adults, still solving playground crimes while the rest of the world has moved on. In execution, though, the film leans so aggressively into that arrested state that it becomes less a parody of detective stories and more a portrait of people who never learned how to recalibrate their identity once the applause stopped.

What happens when a horror-comedy doesn’t care enough about scares or laughs? FULL MOON HIGH is one of those films that practically dares you to misunderstand it. On the surface, it looks like a goofy werewolf parody that came on the scene at the exact wrong moment, released in the same year as some genuinely transformative genre landmarks. That surface exploration is easy, and for many viewers, it’s where the conversation ends. But writer/director Larry Cohen was never interested in making things easy, and even his silliest film carries teeth beneath the fur.