Tremont‘s Hometown News Site

The setup sounds like a joke. A male stripper shows up for a private booking, walks into the wrong room, and suddenly finds himself surrounded by people who are expecting something very different. That kind of premise can fall apart fast if the film relies too heavily on it alone, but this never treats it as a throwaway concept. It locks into the situation and builds everything from how that misunderstanding plays out moment to moment.

Abby doesn’t get a moment to prepare for what she’s walking into. The house is already full, the tone already set, and everyone else seems to have agreed on how this gathering is supposed to feel. She’s the only one out of step, which makes the situation uncomfortable in a way that doesn’t need exaggeration.

There’s a moment early on, before the story really settles in, where the camera lingers just a little too long on an ordinary street in Derry. Nothing jumps out. There's no sudden scare. No clown in sight. But something feels off anyway. That unease sticks with you, and it ends up defining the entire season more than any single appearance from Pennywise. That choice says everything about what this series is trying to do.

TWO TEARS doesn’t treat childhood like a gentler version of adulthood. It treats it like a space where expectations linger longer than they should. From the opening moments, there’s a sense that these girls aren’t just preparing for a performance, they’re already carrying the pressure to prove something they don’t fully understand yet. Everyone should get a fair shot at childhood, no matter their situation.

There’s a moment early on in this story where it becomes clear this isn’t about a name change on some surface level. It’s about who gets to define reality in a place that’s already been defined for lifetimes. That distinction reshapes everything that follows. What could have been a civic debate becomes something far more personal, rooted in memory, power, and the long shadow of decisions that were never meant to be questioned.

PITTSBURGH doesn’t build toward an emotional pivot; it drops you into the world and lets you sit there long enough to recognize what’s happening. There’s no theatrical proclamation, no oversized moment indicating change. Instead, it trusts the audience to catch up with Mints (Delaney Quinn) at the exact moment when something inside her clicks into place. That restraint becomes an incredibly strong asset, especially given how easily a story like this could lean too hard on sentiment or exaggeration.

The entire idea behind STEAKOUT! runs on a joke that could easily collapse under its own weight. It’s a pun stretched into a full premise, all within the confines of an 8-minute runtime, and that’s usually where things fall apart. What’s surprising here is how committed the film is to seeing that idea through, not just as a gag, but as a structure that keeps building on itself.

There’s no warm-up here. PICKUP opens like it’s already halfway through a joke, then immediately pulls the rug out from under its own premise. What starts as something recognizable, almost predictable, shifts direction so quickly that the film ends up feeling less like what it started as and more like a collision between two completely different emotional spaces.

There’s a moment early on in EYELASHES where it becomes clear this isn’t interested in easing you into anything. The situation is already in motion, the stakes are already defined, and the character is already carrying the depth of a decision that doesn’t have an outcome that makes everything better. That gives the film its spine. It doesn’t waste time constructing anxiety. It starts from within it.

SCARBORN doesn’t treat history as something to preserve. It treats it as something to reshape, reinterpret, and push into a more confrontational space. From the start, it’s clear this isn’t aiming for traditional historical accuracy or a straightforward retelling of events. It works within the framework of real figures and real tension, but it filters everything through a tone that is more aggressive, more stylized, and more focused on perspective than on documentation.

SALT ALONG THE TONGUE is one of those movies that you’re either going to love or have no clue how to feel about it. That confidence in itself matters so much because this is not a film interested in making itself easy. It invites you into a world of grief, food, family ritual, superstition, female inheritance, and possession, then lets all of those elements bleed into each other until separating them stops mattering. What makes the film stand out is that it doesn’t treat food as decoration or quirky texture. Food is memory here. Food is language. Food is warning. Food is comfort. Food is violation. Food is how love survives, and how damage gets passed down. That alone gives the film a personality most genre work would kill for.

DEEP WATER doesn’t waste time pretending it’s anything more than a survival thriller built on pressure, atmosphere, and escalation. It sets up its premise, a plane down in the Pacific, survivors stranded, sharks circling, and then locks into that without trying to expand beyond it. There’s no detour into larger mythology, no unnecessary subplot trying to elevate the material. Everything is focused on one thing: getting out alive.

DANGER: DIABOLIK doesn’t ease into the experience, and it shouldn’t. It never adjusts its approach, which is exactly why it works. There’s no attempt to ground the story, no effort to build a relatable entry point, and no concern for traditional pacing. It’s built on a single idea, style over everything, and instead of trying to balance it out, it pushes as far as it can go, and then goes a step further.

Concert films often live or die on vibes. Some rely on scale, others on intimacy, but the ones that endure tend to find a balance between performance and context, capturing not just what happened on stage but why it mattered. SOUL TO SOUL sits decisively in that space, documenting a moment that carries cultural weight beyond the music itself, even when the film around it doesn’t always rise to match that significance. The importance of the moment and what it represented overcame any inherent limitations.

Some horror films build tension through movement, sound, and the threat of something tangible. SMOTHER takes a different approach, grounding itself in the kind of fear that doesn’t always have a clear source. It’s less concerned with what’s lurking in the shadows and more focused on what those shadows represent, particularly when they’re tied to memory, trauma, and the instability of perception. There’s a lot here to unpack; the potential for a truly horrifying story sits in the bones of this film.