Tremont‘s Hometown News Site

DANGER: DIABOLIK doesn’t ease into the experience, and it shouldn’t. It never adjusts its approach, which is exactly why it works. There’s no attempt to ground the story, no effort to build a relatable entry point, and no concern for traditional pacing. It’s built on a single idea, style over everything, and instead of trying to balance it out, it pushes as far as it can go, and then goes a step further.

Concert films often live or die on vibes. Some rely on scale, others on intimacy, but the ones that endure tend to find a balance between performance and context, capturing not just what happened on stage but why it mattered. SOUL TO SOUL sits decisively in that space, documenting a moment that carries cultural weight beyond the music itself, even when the film around it doesn’t always rise to match that significance. The importance of the moment and what it represented overcame any inherent limitations.

Some horror films build tension through movement, sound, and the threat of something tangible. SMOTHER takes a different approach, grounding itself in the kind of fear that doesn’t always have a clear source. It’s less concerned with what’s lurking in the shadows and more focused on what those shadows represent, particularly when they’re tied to memory, trauma, and the instability of perception. There’s a lot here to unpack; the potential for a truly horrifying story sits in the bones of this film.

There’s a version of RUNAWAY TRAIN that could have existed as a more straightforward, almost generic action film. The film is about two escaped convicts stuck on a train with no brakes, racing toward disaster. The setup alone is enough to sustain tension, and in lesser hands, that would have been the entire point. What makes the film hold up decades later is how little interest it had in staying that simple; that’s why it worked so well.

Ambition is easy to celebrate when it comes with victories and milestones, but CONSTANT BATTLES focuses on everything that happens before those moments ever arrive. It centers on the kind of pursuit that may not feel triumphant in real time; the “win” here isn’t a gold medal, it’s where progress is measured in small steps forward, and setbacks carry just as much weight as achievements.

Power doesn’t always show itself through violence. Sometimes it hides behind process, paperwork, and a system designed to protect itself. CONFESSIONS OF A POLICE CAPTAIN builds its entire personality around that idea, presenting a world where justice exists in theory but collapses the moment it’s tested against influence, control, and institutional loyalty.

Stand-up is at its best and most brutal when it’s done right. There’s nowhere to hide, no cut to save you, no one else to blame when something doesn’t land with the audience. NIKKI GLASER: GOOD GIRL doesn’t just understand that, it weaponizes it. This is a set built on control, but not the kind that plays it safe. It’s the kind that knows exactly how far it can push before people start shifting in their seats, and then goes a little further anyway.

The most unsettling part of LET OUR MOUNTAINS LIVE isn’t the conflict it builds around, it’s what happens after the supposed victory. The film moves toward a legal outcome that should signal resolution, only to dismantle that expectation almost immediately. What remains isn’t closure, but a clearer understanding of how little a ruling can matter when enforcement never follows. That shift defines the entire experience. It reframes the story from one about justice to one about its limits.

Telling the story of someone who lived as intensely as they performed on stage comes with a built-in risk, especially when the people closest to them are shaping that narrative. COME WHAT MAY doesn’t try to mitigate that challenge or reshape it into something more comfortable. It accepts the contradictions upfront, presenting Ralphie May as both a commanding comedic presence and a person whose personal struggles were inseparable from his rise.

THE STEWARDESSES is almost easier to talk about as an idea than as a film. The experience of watching it and the significance of what it represents rarely sit in the same place, and that gap never really closes as you watch. One side carries real historical weight, tied to exhibition, technology, and a specific moment in audience demand. The other is what’s actually on screen, and that side struggles to justify itself on its own terms. The strain between those two realities becomes the defining feature of the entire experience.

The idea behind ITCH! is uncomfortable in a way that works and really sticks with you. It doesn’t rely on scale or a deeper backstory to hook you. It goes straight for something physical and instinctive, the kind of reaction you can feel in your own body just hearing it described. That directness is what gives the film such a strong pull. You understand the threat instantly, and more importantly, you understand how quickly it could spiral.

DIDN’T DIE doesn’t open with panic, and that choice tells you everything you need to know about how it sees the world it inhabits. The apocalypse has already happened, the rules are there, and instead of chaos, what’s left is routine. People have conversations, they process the terror around them, they try to maintain some version of normal life, even as the world continues to erode. It’s a deliberate shift away from what the zombie genre typically leans on, and for a while, that shift feels genuinely refreshing.

There’s no easing into an experience like COLONY MUTATION. Within minutes, it’s clear you’re dealing with a film that doesn’t just stretch its limitations, it practically tears through them in pursuit of an idea that’s bigger than the production can reasonably support. And yet, that’s exactly what makes it worth talking about and, more importantly, worth experiencing!

TWO SEASONS, TWO STRANGERS doesn’t ever stretch for attention. It sits back and waits to see if you’re willing to meet it where it exists. There’s no push, no urgency, no signal telling you what you’re supposed to expect while watching. What you get instead is a series of moments that feel disconnected at first, almost resistant to interpretation, until the accumulation starts to settle into something more defined.

Without question, THE RETURN OF THE PINK PANTHER is one of, if not the best, films in this series. After quite a break, it doesn’t try to reintroduce itself or justify its existence. It assumes you already understand what Inspector Clouseau is, what he does, and why that works. Instead of rebuilding the foundation, it jumps straight into the deep end, trusting that the character alone is enough to carry the experience. That trust is mostly rewarded, even if everything surrounding him doesn’t quite reach the same level.

THE PARANORMAL doesn’t ever try apologizing for what it is. It doesn’t try to disguise its shot-on-video roots or ease you into the expectation that you’re about to watch something rough around the edges. It just starts, confident in the idea it’s built around, and lets that do the work. That confidence matters so much in this case, because without it, this would’ve blended into a long list of late-’90s SOV releases that never found a way to stand out.

The connection feels like something deeper, almost immediately, and that’s exactly what makes it suspicious. There’s no uncomfortable escalation, no missteps, no sense of two people figuring each other out. It just works. That kind of vibe is usually what these stories build toward, but here it arrives, settling in before there’s time to question it.

There’s a moment early on here where the audience is still trying to figure out how to respond, and the film doesn’t help (rightfully so). It doesn’t guide you toward empathy, nor does it cushion the discomfort. You’re left sitting in it, unsure whether to laugh, pull back, or just stay quiet. That tension isn’t a side effect. It’s the point.

DESERT WARRIOR works best when it’s operating on instinct instead of obligation. The early stretch focuses on clarity, a sense of direction that feels driven by character rather than expectation. A young woman refusing to be bargained like currency isn’t just a plot trigger; it’s a disruption, and the film briefly understands how powerful that disruption can be.

TWO WOMEN doesn’t ease the audience into the conversation. It lays out what it wants to do and builds from there, asking what happens when two people realize they’re no longer fulfilled by the lives they’ve settled into and choose to do something about it. That gives the film its identity. It isn’t hesitant or delicate with its themes, and that confidence carries through nearly every scene.

There’s a very specific kind of vibe that can’t be purposefully built or recreated once it’s gone, and PRETTY UGLY: THE STORY OF THE LUNACHICKS understands that better than most music documentaries. This isn’t a story trying to rewrite history into something for the mainstream audience or celebratory in a traditional sense. Instead, it leans into the chaos, the contradictions, and the reality of what it meant to be a group of women carving out space in a scene that didn’t welcome them, even if it meant breaking a few things along the way.

KANGAROO ISLAND builds a story around a common but effective idea, returning home after things fall apart elsewhere, only to realize that what you left behind never really settled in the first place. The film leans into it with enough sincerity to keep things engaging, especially when it focuses on the emotional fractures at its center.

FUZE doesn’t waste time pretending it’s anything other than a tightly wound, concept-first thriller built around pressure and controlled chaos. Honestly, that works in its favor for a good stretch of the runtime. A bomb unearthed in the middle of London is already a built-in ticking clock (literally), but FUZE doesn’t stop there. It folds in a heist that thrives on that chaos, immediately giving the story a dual-arc structure, with one side driven by public danger and the other by calculated opportunism. That intersection is where the film finds its strongest footing, especially early on when everything still feels like it could spiral in multiple directions.

HAND keeps a very focused vision and trusts that the weight of its subject will carry the film without added emphasis. It doesn’t build toward some grand reveal. It stays small on purpose, focusing on a single perspective and letting that do the work. Short films' success comes from the impact that they can create, and even more so, the impact that they can leave with you. HAND does that in strides, taking an intimate story that understands the impact it's having on audiences.

BASIC PSYCH builds itself up around a premise that doesn’t need all that much setup to land. A psychiatrist is forced to treat a patient who may pose a real threat, all while being bound by confidentiality. That creates a situation where every decision can lead to something more, leaving risk at every turn. The film understands that from the start and doesn’t waste time getting into it.