Stanford‘s Hometown News Site

How do you measure what survival means when simply existing is treated like an accomplishment? STILL STANDING is one of those short documentaries that wastes absolutely no time pretending it needs more than it does. At ten minutes, it understands its responsibility, its limitations, and its strengths, and it never overreaches. Instead, it tightens its focus until the concept becomes unbearable in the best possible way. This isn’t a film about the exhibition of wildfire, not about flames swallowing neighborhoods, not about cinematic devastation. It is about what comes after, when the fires are gone, some of the houses are technically intact, and the danger is invisible.

What happens when concealed ideology refuses to stay buried? MURPHY’S RANCH wastes no time establishing its tone. What begins as a routine job unfolds with a steady unease, the kind that creeps in rather than presenting itself in an obvious way. The film understands that the most effective horror often comes from recognition, the idea that something deeply wrong has been hiding in plain sight all along.

How much of a family’s identity is inherited, and how much is silently imposed? THE LEMIEURS is the kind of documentary that disarms you by refusing to posture. There’s no thesis announced up front, no framing designed to guide you, no reassuring sense that this film knows exactly where it is headed. Instead, filmmaker Sammy LeMieur begins with proximity. He points the camera at his own family and lets time do the shaping. Over four years, what starts as documentation gradually becomes confrontation, not through conflict itself, but through inevitability.

What happens to a carefully controlled society once its walls stop holding the story inside? PARADISE answers that question head-on in its second season, not by undoing what worked before, but by deliberately stressing until cracks become unavoidable. Where season one thrived on tension, secrecy, and carefully rationed information, season two expands its lens without losing its grip, turning the series from a tightly sealed mystery into something more volatile and emotionally exposed.

What if the hardest part wasn’t surviving the lie, but learning how to live once it returns? THE LAST THING HE TOLD ME: SEASON 2 opens with that unspoken pressure point hanging over every scene. Unlike the standard thrillers that mistake escalation for evolution, this season understands that continuation only works if it deepens the damage already done. Season 2 commits to consequence, building a slower, more psychologically loaded follow-up that trusts its audience to sit with discomfort.

What does it mean for a legend to be built slowly, through repetition, restraint, and time rather than immediacy or excess? Tomu Uchida’s five-film adaptation of Eiji Yoshikawa’s novelized account of Miyamoto Musashi doesn’t aim to overwhelm, and it doesn’t chase grandeur through constant escalation. Instead, the ZEN & SWORD cycle commits to patience, allowing its central figure to evolve incrementally across years, not hours. That choice defines both the strength and the limitation of the saga, especially when experienced as a complete body of work rather than as individual entries spaced apart by theatrical release windows.

What happens when a redemption story is less interested in forgiveness than in unpacking why the apology took twenty years to materialize? THE FALL AND RISE OF REGGIE DINKINS carries a familiar theme that we’ve seen before, but it’s less interested in replicating the past than in questioning what those successes look like through the lens of aging, regret, and legacy. On paper, the premise sounds wide-reaching, almost to a fault, as a disgraced former football star attempts to rehabilitate his image decades after a career-ending scandal by allowing a documentarian into his life. In practice, the series is far more restrained and far more specific than that setup suggests.

At what point does sheer artistic obsession stop being a movie and start becoming an accidental self-portrait? SCARLET WARNING 666 isn’t merely a ‘lost film,’ a cult oddity, or a so-called “bad movie.” It’s a document of obsession preserved frame by agonizing frame. Watching it now, newly restored and finally contextualized, feels less like encountering a forgotten horror film and more like stumbling into a private fixation that was never meant to be archived, let alone reexamined.

How much comfort is a lie worth when the truth offers no path forward? JAKOB THE LIAR occupies an unusual place in Holocaust movies. It doesn't center spectacle, brutality, or history. It focuses on the emotional need for hope, even if the hope is known to be insincere. The film recognizes that survival isn't simply physical, but also emotional, and that desperation can be as deadly as violence.

What does growing up look like when no one teaches you the difference between wanting closeness and using your body to survive loneliness? SOMERSAULT begins mysteriously and never attempts to explain itself. Cate Shortland's directorial debut is not concerned with helping the viewer find their way or rounding out the edges of Heidi's actions. Rather, Shortland puts the viewer directly in the middle of Heidi's uncertainty. This decision is essential to the film's continued relevance twenty years later and to this 4K restoration's role as a necessary introduction rather than a nostalgic trip backto the day.

What does justice sound like when there’s no image to soften it and no silence to hide behind? REEVES CANYON commits to its identity as an audio drama, and this commitment is at once its greatest asset and its most vulnerable liability. There’s no visual shorthand here; no cinematic shortcut to rely upon. Every moment, every transition, every emotional shift must be carried solely by voice, pace, and sound design. The fact that it’s successful isn’t coincidental; it’s the result of a project that knows exactly which medium it is operating within, even when it occasionally pushes beyond those boundaries. Being my second audio project review in the last few months, I feel like the old-school radio drama is truly ready to make a resurgence!

What do people actually mean when they say they believe in heaven, and why does the answer matter so much to them? HEAVEN doesn’t promote or disprove belief; nor does it advocate for curiosity as a virtue. It merely provides a space and then backs away. This is what makes Diane Keaton's directorial debut feel so revolutionary, even to this day. HEAVEN has been around since 1987 and was recently restored. The film plays less like a product of its time and more like one that arrived ahead of its time, waiting for its audience to catch up.

What happens when desire becomes visible in a society that survives by pretending not to see it? Set in Asunción in 1959, NARCISO unfolds at the precise moment when repression and possibility briefly occupy the same space. Rock ’n’ roll drifts into Paraguay like a strange external pulse, carrying warmth, speed, and the illusion that time itself might loosen its grip. For a fleeting moment, the city feels younger, more porous, as if something new might be allowed to take root. But that doesn’t arrive alone. Running beneath it is another cadence, slower and heavier, imposed by a military regime consolidating its authority through discipline, moral policing, and fear. The collision of those forces defines the film’s emotional grounding.

What happens after you refuse to become what your country demands of you, and where do you go when that refusal costs you everything? That question hangs over A RUSSIAN WINTER from the beginning, not as a rhetorical device, but as a lived condition. Patric Chiha doesn’t frame his documentary around shock, urgency, or outrage. Instead, he situates the film in a colder, more unsettling space, the long emotional winter that follows a decision when there is no clear reward for doing the right thing.