Stanford‘s Hometown News Site

THE RUNNING MAN arrives with pre-set expectations baked into its DNA. It’s a remake, a Stephen King adaptation, and an Edgar Wright project, three things that almost demand radical reinvention and/or unapologetic excess. Instead, what this version delivers is something more cautious and more conflicted. It wants to modernize the premise, focus on the class commentary, and smooth out the pulp-cult vibes. Yet, it never fully commits to being as vicious, unhinged, or confrontational as its concept allows. The result is an entertaining, often thoughtful, but ultimately restrained dystopian thriller that feels like it’s holding something back.

COREY FELDMAN VS. THE WORLD doesn’t force your hand in deciding who Corey Feldman is and what his legacy ultimately will be. It doesn’t ease you in, doesn’t soften the edges of its focus, and doesn’t check in to see if you’re comfortable. It places you inside a reality and leaves you there long enough for patterns to form on their own. That patience is its most defining quality, and also the reason it hits as hard as it does.

YOUNGBLOOD understands exactly what kind of movie it is. This modern reimagining of the 1986 cult hockey drama reframes the story through a more contemporary lens, placing less emphasis on swagger and more on consequence. Dean Youngblood is still a prodigy, still volatile, still gifted enough to make enemies before he ever earns trust. What’s different is how seriously the film examines the damage that kind of upbringing causes.

IMMUTABLE doesn’t pretend that debate is some offbeat extracurricular. It treats it like what it actually is for the students at its center, a core lifeline. By following participants in the Washington Urban Debate League over multiple seasons, the documentary positions debate not as an academic game but as a survival skill. These students aren’t just learning how to win arguments. They’re learning how to navigate systems that were never designed to work in their favor. From the outset, the film makes it clear that what’s at stake extends far beyond trophies or rankings.

THE HERMIT wastes no time telling you exactly what kind of movie it wants to be. A remote cabin. Teenagers who’d rather be anywhere else. A gigantic cannibal pig farmer who doesn’t just kill, he processes. It’s blunt, stripped-down backwoods horror that leans into its own absurdity without quite tipping into parody. The central hook is obvious and deliberate: Lou Ferrigno stepping into full-on horror-villain territory. Ferrigno’s physical presence has always done most of the heavy lifting for him, and that’s exactly what this film understands. The Hermit isn’t meant to be psychologically complex. He’s meant to feel imposing, inevitable, and almost monstrous in a way that recalls older exploitation-era slashers. Ferrigno doesn’t overplay it. He moves slowly, deliberately, like a man who knows no one on screen can realistically overpower him. That confidence becomes character.

GOD OF FROGS is built around a simple, unpleasant idea: what if an ancient hunger didn’t just survive, but fed on time itself. Instead of anchoring itself in a single era or set of characters, the film spans decades, returning every 25 years to the same creature and the same cursed lineage. IT is an anthology horror film that wants its creature to feel inevitable rather than surprising, less a jump scare than a recurring infection that adapts to its surroundings.

ALL IS FINE IN ’89 opens with a deceivingly comforting idea, one last high school party before the decade closes, before adulthood officially takes hold, before the outside world demands more than swagger and flirting in hallways. It shines with the aesthetics of late ’80s coming-of-age stories, but it doesn’t stay there. This isn’t a movie content to bask in nostalgia or the reassuring familiarity of its genre's classics. It’s a film about transition, about the exact moment when optimism starts to feel dishonest and pretending everything is fine becomes a form of avoidance.

What does power look like when it’s born from hunger rather than wisdom, and what happens when the myth built to sustain it can no longer hold? EXCALIBUR presents a film that isn’t just an adventure but also a warning, and it never fully lets go of that tension. This isn’t a comforting tale of destiny fulfilled. It is a feverish, often abrasive retelling of the Arthurian legend that treats myth as something volatile, unstable, and deeply human.

SIX STARS wastes no time asking your permission. It begins in motion and stays there, operating with the confidence of something that knows exactly what it wants to confront and refuses to soften the blow. At seven minutes, it doesn’t have the luxury of easing you in, and it doesn’t try. Todd Wiseman Jr. builds the film like a controlled detonation, one idea, one trajectory, no exits. The result is a short that doesn’t feel abbreviated so much as compressed, dense with intent and stripped of anything that might dilute its focus.

What happens to make-believe when the safeguards put in place to maintain it suddenly stop working? WESTWORLD begins with luxury and the idea that anything is possible, and then steadily takes each of those things away, to the point where the very idea of being in control starts to seem like an illusion. Michael Crichton’s first time directing a film doesn’t spend any time preparing the audience. Delos is shown as a place for rich people to play, a place where harm has supposedly been done away with. Visitors can drink, kill, have sex, boss people around, or act out fantasies without any trouble, as the robot ‘hosts’ are made to take the harm and just reset. The offer is deliberately appealing, and Crichton knows the film will only work if people first accept the attraction. WESTWORLD doesn’t warn you right away; it invites you to come in.

What does redemption cost when the person you’d need to be forgiven by has every reason not to forgive you? UNDERCARD isn’t interested in handing out simple answers, and it’s this refusal which, in the end, gives the film its strongest moments. The basic idea is one we’ve seen before, with a former boxing champion, now a trainer, and in recovery from alcoholism, goes back into her grown-up son’s life after time away. He’s skilled, but doesn’t apply himself, and is with people who want to make something of his ability, people who’ll take advantage. She thinks this is one final chance, not just to make someone a fighter, but to fix what she broke. But UNDERCARD isn’t, first and foremost, a sports story about someone making a comeback. It’s a story about facing up to what you’ve done, which just happens to be set in and around a boxing gym. This is how the film keeps itself from being a one-dimensional copy of a redemption story.

When a movie won’t explain itself, not in an attempt to be mysterious, but because it simply has too much going on, then what happens? THE VISITOR begins as if it assumes we already know how their world works, though those rules seem to be made up as it goes along. The film cares less about a focused story than about keeping us disoriented, and this dedication is at once its best quality and its biggest problem.

What happens when an action movie stops trying to make sense? KNOCK OFF decides to dive into the shallow end and challenge you to either give in to the craziness or just scratch your head and wonder what you’re watching, This isn’t a film that wants to let anyone get comfortable and acclimate to its world; it goes quickly, is loud, and piles on the absurdity with the confidence of a director who figures you’ll keep up or be left behind.

What happens when being loyal to your job begins to feel personal? That’s an interesting focus in AMERICAN YAKUZA. This movie appears to be a standard undercover police story, yet it frequently returns to a more complex emotional problem beneath the shooting. It’s a film more concerned with the gradual loss of being sure of things than with surprise or size, though it isn’t always able, or determined enough, to work out that idea fully.

What happens when misery won’t leave you, and the only thing the departed can grasp is revenge? GARDEN OF LOVE doesn’t approach this question with benevolence. It puts it in focus, then waits before ripping people apart. Olaf Ittenbach’s 2003 splatter film has long occupied a strange place among fans of extreme horror; some find it to be too much, while others accept it as operatic violence. Now, with Unearthed Films’ Blu-ray, it seems less like somebody letting themselves go, and more like a director deliberately getting better at what he does.

What happens when a society comes to think of crime not as something to be solved, but as something to be manipulated, a number to change? That’s the quiet question at the heart of CENSOR ADDICTION, and the film never lets it go. Michael Matteo Rossi’s near-future dystopian thriller, set in 2030, presents a world where a very powerful medical company deliberately causes trouble to profit, and then sells the idea of controlling things to the people. The idea isn’t presented delicately, and that’s absolutely intended.

What does it mean for the most well-known songwriter on earth to suddenly find himself without a band, without any support, and without any certainty that people still want to hear what he is doing? MAN ON THE RUN doesn’t attempt to cover The Beatles' story again, nor should it; we have multiple documentaries that have told that story. Here, we’re posed a tougher question: what happens when a legend has to demonstrate his worth from the beginning?

What happens when trying to be relevant means facing up to those you’ve let down? K-POPS! presents itself as bright, musical, though its real heart is more subdued than you’d think. With the energy of a K-pop contest and the fun of a stranger-in-a-strange-land idea, it is a tale of a man who confused what he wanted to do with what his purpose was, and is now at last made to deal with the difference. Anderson .Paak’s first time directing doesn’t attempt to change the genre.

What happens when a television series grows so large that it begins to rewrite public memory, and not just entertain? PEAKY BLINDERS: THE REAL STORY focuses in part on offering an answer to that question, positioning itself less as an extension of a global franchise and more as a corrective lens, one that slows the momentum of cultural obsession long enough to ask what’s been gained, lost, and distorted along the way.

When power, not affection, is the first thing to shape it, what does love look like? DREAMS starts like a romance, but doesn’t want to ease anyone in. Right from the beginning, between Jennifer McCarthy (Jessica Chastain) and Fernando Rodríguez (Isaac Hernández), there’s a lack of balance, not in obvious spitefulness, but in quiet domination. Writer/director Michel Franco isn’t making a big, cross-cultural love story; he’s making a deal which, little by little, shows what it’s about.

THRESHOLD doesn’t begin with triumph; it begins with showing what proximity is. The film follows Jessie Diggins throughout a single World Cup season. It embeds its focus there, not as a highlight reel or a retrospective, but as a record of the daily pressure, physical demand, and psychological strain. From its opening stretch, the documentary makes clear it isn’t interested in building a myth or reframing success. It wants to see what happens when the mechanisms that once drove greatness begin to cause harm.

Is healing still possible once vulnerability becomes mandatory? BARE SKIN begins with the idea of safety, but never lets the viewer forget just how unstable that idea is. The movie quickly creates a space that conveys concern and healing, only to subtly poison it. The thing that makes it so disturbing isn’t the amount of blood or scares, but the gradual understanding that showing what you feel can be as risky as being in physical danger, and when people in charge aren’t held back from doing whatever they want.

What does it mean for a legend to be built slowly, through repetition, restraint, and time rather than immediacy or excess? Tomu Uchida’s five-film adaptation of Eiji Yoshikawa’s novelized account of Miyamoto Musashi doesn’t aim to overwhelm, and it doesn’t chase grandeur through constant escalation. Instead, the ZEN & SWORD cycle commits to patience, allowing its central figure to evolve incrementally across years, not hours. That choice defines both the strength and the limitation of the saga, especially when experienced as a complete body of work rather than as individual entries spaced apart by theatrical release windows.

At what point does sheer artistic obsession stop being a movie and start becoming an accidental self-portrait? SCARLET WARNING 666 isn’t merely a ‘lost film,’ a cult oddity, or a so-called “bad movie.” It’s a document of obsession preserved frame by agonizing frame. Watching it now, newly restored and finally contextualized, feels less like encountering a forgotten horror film and more like stumbling into a private fixation that was never meant to be archived, let alone reexamined.

How much comfort is a lie worth when the truth offers no path forward? JAKOB THE LIAR occupies an unusual place in Holocaust movies. It doesn't center spectacle, brutality, or history. It focuses on the emotional need for hope, even if the hope is known to be insincere. The film recognizes that survival isn't simply physical, but also emotional, and that desperation can be as deadly as violence.